The set of two equations on the previous page are enough to solve any one-dimensional constant-acceleration kinematics problem. However, we can take those two equations and, by recombining them in different ways, end up with this set of five equations:
$$\begin{align} v_f&=v_i+a\Delta t &\color{blue}{\hbox{no}\,\Delta x}\\ \Delta x&=\frac{1}{2}(v_i+v_f)\Delta t &\color{blue}{\hbox{no}\,a}\\ \Delta x&=v_i\Delta t+\frac12a\Delta t^2 &\color{blue}{\hbox{no}\,v_f}\\ \Delta x&=v_f\Delta t-\frac12a\Delta t^2 &\color{blue}{\hbox{no}\,v_i}\\ v_f^2&=v_i^2+2a\Delta x &\color{blue}{\hbox{no}\,\Delta t}\\ \end{align}$$
A warning: these are not five independent equations; we can still only solve for two of the five variables.
So why complicate things? Notice that each of the equations has exactly one of the five variables missing. To solve a kinematics problem for one of the variables, you need to be given three: that leaves one variable that you don't know and don't care about. If you choose the equation that does not include that "don't-know-don't-care" (DKDC) variable, then you can solve that equation directly for the variable you want to know.
For example, if I know a car accelerates from 10m/s to 15m/s over a distance of 500m, and I want to know its acceleration, then my DKDC variable is time. The last equation above doesn't include time, and so if I use it I can solve directly for acceleration: $$15^2=10^2+2a(500) \implies a=0.125\u{m/s^2}$$